|
REASEARCH
ON SOME QUR'ANIC VERSES ABOUT JIHAD & QITAAL
|
First
we shall take the word Kufr, the root of it
is ("K-F-R" pronounced as KAFARA).
It basically means to deny something, disobey
someone, to hide or reject the truth. The words
like Kufr, Iman, Islam, Shirk signify the attitude,
ideas, approach, style, action, reaction or
the state of mind and certainly not the caste,
creed, gender, color or race of a person. It
follows then that even a Muslim will be acting
as a Kafir if he does contrary to what ALLAH
has commanded. Thus many of the verses in the
Holy Book warn the Muslims not to behave like
Kafirs. Even some verses describe that a Muslim
may at times become a Kafir if he does not act
according to the orders of ALLAH and HIS Messenger.
So
the Qur’an decrees in the end of the
Verse 5/5:
“………..
and whoever will disobey orders (Yakfur) side
by side he is in faith (Bil-Eimane), in vain
will be all his deeds, for in the life to come
he shall be among the lost.” And
furthermore in the end of the Verse
3/167:
also contains the same rationale:”…..
on that day they were closure to Kufr rather
than to Eimaan …” The same
argument continues in another verse: “….
Have you done Kufr after your Eimaan?...”
(Chapter 3 verse 106) There are many more such
statements in the Qur’an. We have referred
here only a few.
These
verses make it amply clear that the Deen (religion)
of Allah is not the exclusive property of any
caste, tribe, nation or race; it is a universal
religion. Any one can enter it any time. And
for every Muslim there is always an imminent
danger that he may get out of the fold even
without ever realizing it. So let it be known
to all human beings, including Muslims that
Kufr is a state of disobedience that even a
Muslim can be in. We are quoting the verse in
full to make it clear to the Muslims. It is
Chapter 3 Verse 106:
"On
the Day of Judgment, when some faces will shine
with happiness and some faces will be dark with
grief. As for those with faces darkened, they
will be asked: ‘Did you do Kufr (disobedience)
after your Eimaan (faith) ? So taste this suffering
of your disobedience."
(From
Holy Qur'an 3/106)
|
It
is evident from these references that even a
person who regards himself as Muslim may be
in a state of Kufr. Kufr is the state of mind,
style, approach, attitude etc. The Muslims out
of ignorance call the non-Muslims as Kafirs
(disbelievers) and regard themselves as Momin
(believer). Bur their Lord declares that in
spite of being born in a Muslim family, one
can be a Kafir by his ignoble acts and deeds,
unless he accepts the universal truths and upholds
noble human values in his day-to-day life. One
has to prove the strength of his Eimaan (faith)
by a complete submission to the will of his
LORD. The Qur’an does not approve the
concept of religion by birth. A man who is born
in this world is first a human being. It is
unfair to declare a child, a Muslim or non-Muslim
by birth. It is against the spirit of the Qur’an
as well as the teachings of Prophet Mohammed.
There are only three religions in the world
that believe in religion-by-birth. They are
Hinduism, Zionism and Zoroastrianism. Islam
keeps its door open for all every time. And
it has exit points also. It is a conscious submission
to the Divine Law and living a life of high
moral standards in accordance with the commandments
and the practice of the Prophet. It is also
evident in the history of Muslim rulers that
they many times misused these terms for their
political gains.
Let us finally conclude that in the Holy Qur’an,
terms like Kufr or Kafir do not necessarily
refer to the Hindus or any non-Muslim group.
Nor the word Kufr has anything to do with the
caste, color, language, nation, tribe and religion
of a person or group of persons.
Q.1-C.
The Qur’an at several places provokes
the Muslims to fight against the infidel and
polytheist and shed their blood. Doesn’t
such provocation become more destructive when
the word ‘infidel’ (Kafir) becomes
a synonym for the word ‘Hindu’?
Is it not a theoretical and practical onslaught
upon peace and order?
Analysis
1-C:
This is the first question in which it is alleged
that the Qur’an repeatedly provokes upon
killing Kafirs. The objection is categorical
but without any reference to any Chapter or
Verse! We do not discharge the question on this
basis and assume that the Qur’anic war-time
injunctions to the soldiers or the commanders
of the armies are misunderstood as injunctions
to general citizens. Now let us consider the
following points here.
We are well aware that battles or war never
take place without a strong motivating cause.
And when there is a war, it involves armies
from both the sides. The vehemence with which
the Qur’an heavily condemns blood shed,
killing anybody without genuine lawful reasons,
rioting and creating chaotic conditions in land
is hardly found in other religious scriptures.
What the Qur’an says about such heinous
crimes is mentioned below:
(Chapter
5 Verse 32)
|
“From
the very first killing of a human on the earth, WE
wrote even on the Children of Israel that if anyone
kills a human being, unless it be in punishment for
murder or for spreading riot on earth, it shall be
as though he had killed all mankind; whereas if anyone
saves a life, it shall be as though he had saved the
lives of all mankind. Indeed there came unto them
OUR message-bearers with all evidence of the truth,
yet many of them go on committing all manner of excesses
on earth.”
(From
Holy Qur'an 5/32)
How
can the Qur’an which denounces the unlawful
killing of even one person in such strong and unambiguous
term, exhort the Muslims to shed human blood ruthlessly
without any cause and reason? Of course Muslim history
at several times violates the bounds of the Qur’an.
It overflowed several times causing great devastation,
resulting in some time in total extinction and liquidation
of their rule in some parts of earth. The misdeeds
of certain Muslim ruling dynasties or groups can’t
be superimposed upon the Qur’an or Islam. What
the Qur’an teaches is one thing and what a particular
group or individual professing Islam does is another
thing. And the two needn’t be confused as synonymous.
Everybody
accepts that practice must go hand in hand with precept.
But if they do not, then it is upon the performer
that the responsibility falls in entirety. If some
Muslims fail to walk steadily in the Light of the
Qur’an and the Sunnah, where is the necessity
to find fault with the Light itself? Nobody holds
a brief for the misdeeds and misadventures of some
Muslim despots who have even misused the Islamic terminology
to serve their non-Qur’anic designs. They are
rightly condemned.
|
|
|
|
|
|